|By Michael Flagg | Excerpted from the June 2010 Socionomist
Originally published under the title “Military and Political Leaders Need a Socionomic Perspective”
[Ed: Michael Flagg blogs about socionomics at Futurejacked.blogspot.com. He holds degrees in history and nuclear engineering and currently works as a project manager at a nuclear research reactor.
[In this article, originally posted on May 28, 2010, Flagg asserts that even the best military and political analysts tend to commit a cardinal sin of forecasting: They assume that all current trends will continue. He suggests an alternative basis for mapping future probabilities.]
One of the few news service subscriptions I keep up is Stratfor. The site provides some of the best conventional analysis available, certainly more in-depth than mass market websites and magazines and often sourced very well when it comes to high-level strategic decisions made by military and political leaders throughout the world. This group cuts through the partisan haze and gets down to the mechanics of how power is exercised around the globe.
Having a source that is so well plugged in gives us a fantastic window into the minds of Western power elites. In my opinion, that same connectedness hinders them from catching dramatic turns in mass sentiment such as the one we are living through today.
… Looking over the topics on Stratfor’s [then-current] main page, I am amazed by the lack of ongoing attention to potential fracture points in the conventional framework. Scanning the topics this morning, I see:
- a review of an attempt by Palestinian supporters to break the Gaza blockade;
- a discussion of trade tensions between Argentina and Brazil
- a special report on security for the World Cup matches to be held in South Africa;
- an in-depth review of efforts by Hungary to extend citizenship to Hungarians outside the current borders of the country.
So what, you ask?
In the late 1700s, conventional analysis would have been discussing the numerical and training superiority of British troops and how it meant almost sure victory over a dispersed rabble in the North American colonies. A few years later, the same analysts would have stated that the enraged peasants of France stood no chance against a monarchical structure in place since the Middle Ages. I won’t even go into how bankrupt conventional economic analysis has become. This is the kind of analysis that today’s elites in politics are reading and understanding to be accepted facts. The decisions that will be made—or not made—in the coming weeks and months will likely lack recognition that we are at a watershed moment in history. They will be divorced of any grand understanding of the big, changing picture. They will reflect conventional thinking, focusing on the minutiae of tactics and political hustle and treating anger and violence as isolated expressions of local unrest. …
In the remainder of this two-page report, Flagg explains how socionomics can enable you to “see around the corner” during historic turning points and important times of change.
Want more content like this?
The Socionomist is the only monthly publication that offers you practical insights on the relationship between social mood, financial markets and cultural trends. Each issue warns you about big societal changes before they can harm you and reveals breakthrough opportunities emerging from trends in society.
(Socionomics Members: Log in for the full article and your complete, exclusive archive.)
Socionomist is a monthly online magazine designed to help
readers see and capitalize on the waves of social mood that contantly occur
throughout the world. It is published by the Socionomics
Institute, Robert R. Prechter, president; Matt Lampert, editor-in-chief;
Alyssa Hayden, editor; Alan Hall and Chuck Thompson, staff writers; Dave Allman
and Pete Kendall, editorial direction; Chuck Thompson, production; Ben Hall,
For subscription matters, contact Customer Care: Call 770-536-0309 (internationally) or 800-336-1618 (within the U.S.). Or email email@example.com.
We are always interested in guest submissions. Please email manuscripts and proposals to Chuck Thompson via firstname.lastname@example.org. Mailing address: P.O. Box 1618, Gainesville, Georgia, 30503, U.S.A. Phone 770-536-0309. Please consult the submission guidelines located at https://3d8988.p3cdn1.secureserver.net/PDF/Socionomist_Submission_Guidelines.pdf.
For our latest offerings: Visit our website, www.socionomics.net, listing BOOKS, DVDs and more.
Correspondence is welcome, but volume of mail often precludes a reply. Whether it is a general inquiry, socionomics commentary or a research idea, you can email us at email@example.com.
Most economists, historians and sociologists
presume that events determine society’s mood. But socionomics hypothesizes
the opposite: that social mood regulates the character of social events. The
events of history—such as investment booms and busts, political events,
macroeconomic trends and even peace and war—are the products of a naturally
occurring pattern of social-mood fluctuation. Such events, therefore, are not
randomly distributed, as is commonly believed, but are in fact probabilistically
predictable. Socionomics also posits that the stock market is the best available
meter of a society’s aggregate mood, that news is irrelevant to social
mood, and that financial and economic decision-making are fundamentally different
in that financial decisions are motivated by the herding impulse while economic
choices are guided by supply and demand. For more information about socionomic
theory, see (1) the text, The
Wave Principle of Human Social Behavior © 1999, by Robert Prechter;
(2) the introductory documentary History's
Hidden Engine; (3) the video Toward
a New Science of Social Prediction, Prechter’s 2004 speech before
the London School of Economics in which he presents evidence to support his
socionomic hypothesis; and (4) the Socionomics Institute’s website, www.socionomics.net.
At no time will the Socionomics Institute make specific recommendations about
a course of action for any specific person, and at no time may a reader, caller
or viewer be justified in inferring that any such advice is intended.
All contents copyright © 2023 Socionomics Institute. All rights reserved. Feel free to quote, cite or review, giving full credit. Typos and other such errors may be corrected after initial posting.