Social Mood Conference | Socionomics Foundation
Originally published in the Jan. 2011 Socionomist

With stunning suddenness, citizens across the Arab world have challenged authoritarian regimes long thought invincible. In Tunisia, Libya, Lebanon, Yemen, Algeria, Jordan and Egypt, thousands of Islamist and secular protesters thronged the streets demanding the removal of their corrupt authoritarian leaders.

Our authoritarianism study in the April 2010 issue of The Socionomist anticipated such conflict:

We forecast that a continuing long-term trend toward negative social mood will produce increasingly authoritarian—and anti-authoritarian—impulses.

We went on to say,

Governments will shut down sections of the Internet.


A government that feels threatened by its citizens usually clamps down on the information flow. This makes the Internet a prime authoritarian/anti-authoritarian battleground.

Other authoritarian governments are becoming nervous and also are attempting to control communications. For example, Chinese authorities have restricted news of Egypt’s protests. CBS News headlines, “Renewed Push to Give Obama an Internet ‘Kill Switch.’”

AFP reported on January 29, 2011 that Egypt’s Internet shutdown was the “worst in Internet history.” The chart below shows an entire country suddenly forced into electronic silence. Authorities also cut cell phone service in “the most comprehensive official electronic blackout of its kind.”

Pundits—as they continue to do with the financial crisis—recount timelines and cite a litany of exogenous causes for the Arab unrest. Many think WikiLeaks, Twitter and social networking made the anti-authoritarian actions possible. A January 27 Reuters analysis says, “Authoritarian states are facing an information age. Control of the media is harder and protest can spread much faster.”

A February 3 Financial Times article, “UK seeks global accord on cyber behaviour,” describes cyberspace as “a growing security threat.” As we said in the November 2010 issue of The Socionomist, “The free and open Internet is a creation of peaking social mood; a large-degree bear market will change it radically.” It is now more apparent that the social mood decline is generating fear that is darkening society’s perception of the Internet. What it once saw as inclusive, connective and beneficial, society increasingly perceives as a threat or even a weapon.

History shows that people have gathered, protested and rebelled for centuries whether or not social media were available. Gathering and communicating—however it happens—is important to anti-authoritarian movements. We illustrated this dynamic in our April study via a quote from psychologist Stanley Milgram, author of the famous 1961 Milgram experiment:

When an individual wishes to stand in opposition to authority, he does best to find support for his position from others in his group. The mutual support provided by men for each other is the strongest bulwark we have against the excesses of authority.

The social mood trend—not electronics—will define the potential for more anti-autocratic conflict. If the 22-month rebound in global social mood yields to the larger downward trend, as Elliott Wave International expects, authoritarian/anti-authoritarian conflict will both widen and intensify.

Socionomics InstituteThe Socionomist is a monthly online magazine designed to help readers see and capitalize on the waves of social mood that contantly occur throughout the world. It is published by the Socionomics Institute, Robert R. Prechter, president; Matt Lampert, editor-in-chief; Alyssa Hayden, editor; Alan Hall and Chuck Thompson, staff writers; Dave Allman and Pete Kendall, editorial direction; Chuck Thompson, production; Ben Hall, proofreader.

For subscription matters, contact Customer Care: Call 770-536-0309 (internationally) or 800-336-1618 (within the U.S.). Or email

We are always interested in guest submissions. Please email manuscripts and proposals to Chuck Thompson via Mailing address: P.O. Box 1618, Gainesville, Georgia, 30503, U.S.A. Phone 770-536-0309. Please consult the submission guidelines located at

For our latest offerings: Visit our website,, listing BOOKS, DVDs and more.

Correspondence is welcome, but volume of mail often precludes a reply. Whether it is a general inquiry, socionomics commentary or a research idea, you can email us at

Most economists, historians and sociologists presume that events determine society’s mood. But socionomics hypothesizes the opposite: that social mood regulates the character of social events. The events of history—such as investment booms and busts, political events, macroeconomic trends and even peace and war—are the products of a naturally occurring pattern of social-mood fluctuation. Such events, therefore, are not randomly distributed, as is commonly believed, but are in fact probabilistically predictable. Socionomics also posits that the stock market is the best available meter of a society’s aggregate mood, that news is irrelevant to social mood, and that financial and economic decision-making are fundamentally different in that financial decisions are motivated by the herding impulse while economic choices are guided by supply and demand. For more information about socionomic theory, see (1) the text, The Wave Principle of Human Social Behavior © 1999, by Robert Prechter; (2) the introductory documentary History's Hidden Engine; (3) the video Toward a New Science of Social Prediction, Prechter’s 2004 speech before the London School of Economics in which he presents evidence to support his socionomic hypothesis; and (4) the Socionomics Institute’s website, At no time will the Socionomics Institute make specific recommendations about a course of action for any specific person, and at no time may a reader, caller or viewer be justified in inferring that any such advice is intended.

All contents copyright © 2023 Socionomics Institute. All rights reserved. Feel free to quote, cite or review, giving full credit. Typos and other such errors may be corrected after initial posting.