Social Mood Conference | Socionomics Foundation
By Mark Galasiewski, Editor of The Asian-Pacific Financial Forecast
Article originally published in the July 2011 Socionomist

[Note: This article excerpts Galasiewski’s presentation at the 2011 Socionomics Summit in Atlanta. Subscribers to The Socionomist may view the entire presentation via streamed video here (log-in required).]

In the summer of 2008, I first noticed and began researching a sudden surge of terrorist activity in South Asia. One event that piqued my interest in particular was the bombing of the Marriott hotel in Islamabad, Pakistan. So I pulled up a chart of Pakistan’s stock market (see Figure 1 on page 6).

The Marriott bombing made sense from a socionomic perspective, because we know that social violence often tends to break out when equity prices have fallen for some time. In fact, acts of violence usually occur near lows. Al-Qaeda was suspected to be behind the Marriott attack. I decided to see whether other al-Qaeda attacks also were correlated to Pakistan’s mood as expressed by its stock market. The idea was that the leadership for the group was based in the mountains of this region, and perhaps the region’s social mood was influencing their decisions.

The event that came to mind first was 9/11—al-Qaeda’s notorious attack on the United States on September 11, 2001. Could it be that al-Qaeda’s most ambitious attack on a U.S. target also marked the end of this negative social mood period as expressed by this stock index? As the chart shows, it did. In fact, not only Pakistan but many stock markets in Asia were in bear markets while the U.S. and Europe boomed during the 1990s. As it turns out, those bear markets help explain the popularity of al-Qaeda leading up to 9/11.

Figure 1 shows other selected al-Qaeda attacks on American targets or targets perceived to be American. (The data is from, a division of Pearson Publishing.) You can see that al-Qaeda executed its first attack on an American target after the bear market of the early 1990s had ended. This was the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center.

Al-Qaeda's Mood Meter

Figure 1

The group made its next major attack on a U.S. target during the 1996 decline, when it bombed a U.S. military barracks in Saudi Arabia, killing 19 people. Bin Laden then announced his fatwa against the United States near that 1996 low. But the most lethal attack of that bear market was right after the 1998 low, when al-Qaeda bombed the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.

Following 9/11, during the bull market, attacks occurred during minor corrections within the advance. But those attacks were invariably of lesser degree and less lethal than those that had occurred during the bear market. Following one decline, in 2005, there was a particularly lethal attack on three American hotels in Jordan that killed 57 people. But you can see that as social mood continued to rise, the attacks basically dried up.

The 2008 decline led to the bombing of the Islamabad Marriott. And that of course made sense as well, because it was the largest, most lethal attack since 9/11, coinciding with the largest decline since 9/11. As prices have since rallied after the low, the few attacks that al-Qaeda has attempted have been of smaller degree, less lethal and in fact even unsuccessful. You may remember the underwear bomber who attempted to blow up Northwest Airlines flight 253 in late 2009. That attack occurred during a small correction.

The most important aspect of this chart may be indicated by the blue ovals. When stock prices have been rising for some time, terrorist organizations seem to find it difficult to attract and keep highly talented or highly skilled people, and there are no terrorist attacks. That’s the power of positive social mood.■

All 12 speakers’ full Summit presentations are available now for order. To learn more about the DVD and place your order, follow this link:

Socionomics InstituteThe Socionomist is a monthly online magazine designed to help readers see and capitalize on the waves of social mood that contantly occur throughout the world. It is published by the Socionomics Institute, Robert R. Prechter, president; Matt Lampert, editor-in-chief; Alyssa Hayden, editor; Alan Hall and Chuck Thompson, staff writers; Dave Allman and Pete Kendall, editorial direction; Chuck Thompson, production; Ben Hall, proofreader.

For subscription matters, contact Customer Care: Call 770-536-0309 (internationally) or 800-336-1618 (within the U.S.). Or email

We are always interested in guest submissions. Please email manuscripts and proposals to Chuck Thompson via Mailing address: P.O. Box 1618, Gainesville, Georgia, 30503, U.S.A. Phone 770-536-0309. Please consult the submission guidelines located at

For our latest offerings: Visit our website,, listing BOOKS, DVDs and more.

Correspondence is welcome, but volume of mail often precludes a reply. Whether it is a general inquiry, socionomics commentary or a research idea, you can email us at

Most economists, historians and sociologists presume that events determine society’s mood. But socionomics hypothesizes the opposite: that social mood regulates the character of social events. The events of history—such as investment booms and busts, political events, macroeconomic trends and even peace and war—are the products of a naturally occurring pattern of social-mood fluctuation. Such events, therefore, are not randomly distributed, as is commonly believed, but are in fact probabilistically predictable. Socionomics also posits that the stock market is the best available meter of a society’s aggregate mood, that news is irrelevant to social mood, and that financial and economic decision-making are fundamentally different in that financial decisions are motivated by the herding impulse while economic choices are guided by supply and demand. For more information about socionomic theory, see (1) the text, The Wave Principle of Human Social Behavior © 1999, by Robert Prechter; (2) the introductory documentary History's Hidden Engine; (3) the video Toward a New Science of Social Prediction, Prechter’s 2004 speech before the London School of Economics in which he presents evidence to support his socionomic hypothesis; and (4) the Socionomics Institute’s website, At no time will the Socionomics Institute make specific recommendations about a course of action for any specific person, and at no time may a reader, caller or viewer be justified in inferring that any such advice is intended.

All contents copyright © 2022 Socionomics Institute. All rights reserved. Feel free to quote, cite or review, giving full credit. Typos and other such errors may be corrected after initial posting.