|By Chuck Thompson | Excerpted from the October 2012 Socionomist|
[Ed: What can secret agents and haunted houses tell us about the social mood? A lot, according to socionomics.
[In this fascinating article, Chuck Thompson explains that the films that are popular at a given time manifest the then-current social mood of a society. Here is an excerpt of Thompson’s October 2012 report, released during a period of deeply mixed mood in the U.S. as evidenced by a powerful bull-market rally in stocks.]
A New Bond for a New Day?
Writer Ian Fleming created the book version of the James Bond character in 1952, near the beginning of the postwar bull market. Beginning 10 years later with Dr. No, there have been 23 official films in the series, and their success has waxed and waned with the stock market.
…Figure 1 (updated to 2012), from the April 2007 Theorist, shows the popularity of Bond films (as surveyed by IMDb.com) against the inflation-adjusted Dow. Socionomist Mark Galasiewski wrote in the Theorist:
[Bond’s] popularity first peaked with the third film in the series, Goldfinger, almost in line with the DJIA in the mid-1960s. The first leg down of the subsequent bear market produced a spoof of the series, also titled Casino Royale (1967). The franchise continued to suffer as the bear market wore on; its ratings bottomed with Never Say Never Again (1983) and A View to a Kill (1985), shortly after the bear market ended in 1982. The popularity of the character returned to favor with the 1980s and 1990s bull market before bottoming again with the stock market in 2002. It reached a new all-time high along with the Dow in 2006’s Casino Royale.
Indeed, IMDb gave Casino Royale a 7.9 rating. But the next film in the series, Quantum of Solace, was released in the downturn of 2008 and received a far less glowing 6.8.
What about the newest Bond film, Skyfall? Considering the influence of positive mood—as reflected by the current rally in the markets—Skyfall is likely to be rated very highly. [Ed: As of October 30, 2012, the film had an IMDb rating of 8.4 after openings in non-US markets.] …
… Kids’ Flick Fails as Dark Movie Prevails
The Socionomist has looked at recent films’ increasing horror, gore, violence and negative outcomes. This trend toward dark themes was established again during the 2012 Labor Day weekend, when the kids’ flick The Oogieloves in the BIG Balloon Adventure recorded the worst opening weekend ($443,901) of all time for a film playing in more than 2,000 theaters.6 That same weekend, The Possession, a horror flick about a girl controlled by an ancient malevolent spirit, earned the second-best gross ever ($21.3 million) for a Labor Day weekend movie.7 …
Read the rest of this three-page article to learn why horror movies such as The Possession are thriving in the box office and why people are flocking to radical haunted houses that inflict intense psychological torment—all while the bull-market Bond series thrives.
(Bonus: A newly-released Japanese product lets you express and share your emotions with an attachable tail. Seriously! This brief aside should fascinate anyone interested in tracking human emotion.)
Want more content like this?
The Socionomist is the only monthly publication that offers you practical insights on the relationship between social mood, financial markets and cultural trends. Each issue warns you about big societal changes before they can harm you and reveals breakthrough opportunities emerging from trends in society.
Learn more about The Socionomist now.
(Socionomics Members: Log in for the full article and your complete, exclusive archive.)
Socionomist is a monthly online magazine designed to help
readers see and capitalize on the waves of social mood that contantly occur
throughout the world. It is published by the Socionomics
Institute, Robert R. Prechter, president; Matt Lampert, editor-in-chief;
Alyssa Hayden, editor; Alan Hall and Chuck Thompson, staff writers; Dave Allman
and Pete Kendall, editorial direction; Chuck Thompson, production; Ben Hall,
For subscription matters, contact Customer Care: Call 770-536-0309 (internationally) or 800-336-1618 (within the U.S.). Or email email@example.com.
We are always interested in guest submissions. Please email manuscripts and proposals to Chuck Thompson via firstname.lastname@example.org. Mailing address: P.O. Box 1618, Gainesville, Georgia, 30503, U.S.A. Phone 770-536-0309. Please consult the submission guidelines located at https://3d8988.p3cdn1.secureserver.net/PDF/Socionomist_Submission_Guidelines.pdf.
For our latest offerings: Visit our website, www.socionomics.net, listing BOOKS, DVDs and more.
Correspondence is welcome, but volume of mail often precludes a reply. Whether it is a general inquiry, socionomics commentary or a research idea, you can email us at email@example.com.
Most economists, historians and sociologists
presume that events determine society’s mood. But socionomics hypothesizes
the opposite: that social mood regulates the character of social events. The
events of history—such as investment booms and busts, political events,
macroeconomic trends and even peace and war—are the products of a naturally
occurring pattern of social-mood fluctuation. Such events, therefore, are not
randomly distributed, as is commonly believed, but are in fact probabilistically
predictable. Socionomics also posits that the stock market is the best available
meter of a society’s aggregate mood, that news is irrelevant to social
mood, and that financial and economic decision-making are fundamentally different
in that financial decisions are motivated by the herding impulse while economic
choices are guided by supply and demand. For more information about socionomic
theory, see (1) the text, The
Wave Principle of Human Social Behavior © 1999, by Robert Prechter;
(2) the introductory documentary History's
Hidden Engine; (3) the video Toward
a New Science of Social Prediction, Prechter’s 2004 speech before
the London School of Economics in which he presents evidence to support his
socionomic hypothesis; and (4) the Socionomics Institute’s website, www.socionomics.net.
At no time will the Socionomics Institute make specific recommendations about
a course of action for any specific person, and at no time may a reader, caller
or viewer be justified in inferring that any such advice is intended.
All contents copyright © 2023 Socionomics Institute. All rights reserved. Feel free to quote, cite or review, giving full credit. Typos and other such errors may be corrected after initial posting.